THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 13.58.156.237 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Close Search Advanced
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre

Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre
Add to basket

Year:    2014

Author:    Wendler, Roy

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 55 (2014), Iss. 1 : pp. 32–36

Abstract

Maturity models are management tools, which are mainly applied in Information Systems and Informatics. However, their roots are to be found in Business Administration, particularly in Quality Management. Therefore, the following article aims at introducing the concept of maturity models from a linguistic, an application-based, and a structural perspective prior to exemplarily presenting potential application domains in management and business administration.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    German

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.55.1.32

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 55 (2014), Iss. 1 : pp. 32–36

Published online:    2014-02

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot, Deutscher Betriebswirte-Verlag GmbH

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    5

Keywords:    Qualitätskriterien linguistische Perspektive Supply Chain Management

Author Details

Wendler, Roy

  1. PPS-Aufgaben im Kontext des Industrie-4.0-Reifegrads

    Bach, Thies | Fischer, Markus | Schuh, Günther | Schröer, Tobias

    ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 115 (2020), Iss. 9 P.641

    https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112403 [Citations: 0]
  2. Disruptive Technologien im Mittelstand

    Reifegradmanagement des Produktentwicklungsprozesses von Produkten auf Basis disruptiver Technologien

    Janke, Angela | Burkhardt, Nicolas

    2018

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17137-7_6 [Citations: 0]

  1. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5  Google Scholar
  2. Cooke-Davies, T. (2007). Project management maturity models. In P. W. G. Morris & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The WILEY GUIDE to Project Organization & Project Management Competencies (pp. 290–311). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.  Google Scholar
  3. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  4. Dudenredaktion. (2011). Duden: Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (7th ed.). Mannheim: Duden.  Google Scholar
  5. Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2009). Towards a stage theory for industrial management research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1264–1273. doi:10.1108/02635570911002315  Google Scholar
  6. Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (2002). Project Management Maturity Models: The SIlver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4–14.  Google Scholar
  7. Klimko, G. (2001). Knowledge management and maturity models: building common understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 269–278).  Google Scholar
  8. Kohoutek, H. J. (1996). Reflections on the Capability and Maturity Models of Engineering Processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 12, 147–155.  Google Scholar
  9. Kwak, Y. H., & Ibbs, C. W. (2000). Calculating Project Management’s Return on Investment. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 38–47.  Google Scholar
  10. Lahti, M., Shamsuzzoha, A. H. M., & Helo, P. (2009). Developing a maturity model for Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(6), 654–678.  Google Scholar
  11. Lockamy III, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 272–278. doi:10.1108/13598540410550019  Google Scholar
  12. Lyytinen, K. (1991). Penetration of Information Technology in Organizations: A Comparative Study Using Stage Models and Transaction Costs. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 3(1), 87–109.  Google Scholar
  13. McBride, T. (2010). Organisational theory perspective on process capability measurement scales. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 22, 243–254. doi:10.1002/spip  Google Scholar
  14. McRoberts, H. A., & Sloan, B. C. (1998). Financial Management Capability Model. International Journal of Government Auditing, 25(3), 8–11.  Google Scholar
  15. Nolan, R. L. (1979). Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Business Review, 57, 115–127.  Google Scholar
  16. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, PA.  Google Scholar
  17. Project Management Institute. (2008). Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) (2nd ed.). Newton Square, PA.  Google Scholar
  18. Pullen, W. (2007). A Public Sector HPT Maturity Model. Performance Improvement, 46(4), 9–15. doi:10.1002/pfi  Google Scholar
  19. Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  20. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Software Engineering Institute. (2010). CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3. Pittsburgh, PA.  Google Scholar
  22. Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Wien: Springer.  Google Scholar
  23. van Grembergen, W., & Saull, R. (2001). Aligning Business and Information Technology through the Balanced Scorecard at a Major Canadian Financial Group: its Status Measured with an IT BSC Maturity Model. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 00, pp. 1–10).  Google Scholar
  24. Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317–1339. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007  Google Scholar

Section Title Page Action Price
Roy Wendler: Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre 32
Summary 32
1 Einleitung 32
2 Entstehung 32
3 Grundlegende Konzepte 33
3.1 Linguistische Perspektive: Begriffliche Grundlagen 33
3.2 Anwendungsbezogene Perspektive: Nutzen und Verwendung 33
3.3 Strukturelle Perspektive: Struktur und Bestandteile 34
3.4 Zusammenführung 34
4 Potenzielle Einsatzgebiete in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre 35
4.1 Projektmanagement 35
4.2 Supply Chain Management 35
4.3 Controlling und Finanzen 36
4.4 Kritische Würdigung 36
Literatur 36