THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.17.182.90 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

„Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.“

„Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.“

Year:    2020

Author:    Mehring, Reinhard

Der Staat, Vol. 59 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 29–47

Abstract

"Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen." Heinrich Triepel, Carl Schmitt and The Hegemony

The article discusses general and political differences between Heinrich Triepel (1869-1946) and Carl Schmitt (1888-1985), on the basis of their rather marginal academic contacts prior to 1933, Triepel's late work Die Hegemonie (The Hegemony), published in 1938, Schmitt's detailed review thereof, as well as Triepel's last posthumously published work Vom Stil des Rechts (On the Style of the Law), that distanced itself in neo-humanistic fashion from National Socialism. Triepel was a Wilhelminian Bismarck admirer and monarchist by heart. Where Triepel wanted "Hegemonie" (hegemony) and strictly distinguished it from imperial and dictatorial "rule" (Herrschaft), Schmitt, in the transition to his "Großraumlehre" (Greater Area Policy), insisted on National Socialist "Führung" (leadership). Schmitt's matter-of-fact and respectful positioning towards Triepel highlights the conflict of methods and directions as a "political generational conflict" (Möllers).

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    German

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/staa.59.1.29

Der Staat, Vol. 59 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 29–47

Published online:    2020-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    19

Keywords:    Law Recht Droit

Author Details

Mehring, Reinhard

Section Title Page Action Price
„Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.” 29
Heinrich Triepel, Carl Schmitt und Die Hegemonie 29
I. Blütenlese einiger Erwähnungen 30
II. Triepels Präferenz für „Hegemonie” 33
III. Schmitts Triepel-Besprechung 29
IV. „Abscheu” vor dem Nationalsozialismus: Triepels Letztwerk Vom Stil des Rechts 29
V. Zur normativen Methode und Aktualität der Hegemonie 29