THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 52.15.122.33 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Do Commodity Index Traders Destabilize Agricultural Futures Prices

Do Commodity Index Traders Destabilize Agricultural Futures Prices

Year:    2013

Author:    Bohl, Martin T., Javed, Farrukh, Stephan, Patrick M.

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 59 (2013), Iss. 2 : pp. 125–148

Abstract

Motivated by repeated price spikes and crashes over the last decade, we investigate whether the intensive investment activities of commodity index traders (CITs) have destabilized agricultural futures markets. Using a stochastic volatility model, we treat conditional volatility as an unobserved component, and analyze whether it has been affected by the expected and unexpected open interest of CITs. However, with respect to twelve increasingly financialized grain, livestock, and soft commodities, we do not find robust evidence that this is the case. We thus conclude that justifying a tighter regulation of CITs by blaming them for more volatile agricultural futures markets appears to be unwarranted.

JEL Classification: G10, G18, Q14

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.59.2.125

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 59 (2013), Iss. 2 : pp. 125–148

Published online:    2013-06

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    24

Author Details

Bohl, Martin T.

Javed, Farrukh

Stephan, Patrick M.

  1. Intermediary capital risk and commodity futures volatility

    Yin, Libo | Nie, Jing | Han, Liyan

    Journal of Futures Markets, Vol. 41 (2021), Iss. 5 P.577

    https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22185 [Citations: 6]
  2. Do biofuel production and financial speculation in agricultural commodities influence African food prices? New evidence from a TVP-VAR extended joint connectedness approach

    Guo, Jin | Tanaka, Tetsuji

    Energy Economics, Vol. 116 (2022), Iss. P.106422

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106422 [Citations: 4]
  3. Investor demand, market efficiency and spot-futures relation: Further evidence from crude palm oil

    Go, You-How | Lau, Wee-Yeap

    Resources Policy, Vol. 53 (2017), Iss. P.135

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.06.009 [Citations: 11]
  4. Volatility transmission in agricultural futures markets

    Beckmann, Joscha | Czudaj, Robert

    Economic Modelling, Vol. 36 (2014), Iss. P.541

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.09.036 [Citations: 65]
  5. Commodity market risk from 1995 to 2013: an extreme value theory approach

    Fretheim, Torun | Kristiansen, Glenn

    Applied Economics, Vol. 47 (2015), Iss. 26 P.2768

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1011307 [Citations: 7]
  6. Spillovers between non-commercial traders’ activity and spot prices? Analysis of the financialization mechanism in the crude oil market

    Focacci, Antonio

    China Finance Review International, Vol. 13 (2023), Iss. 2 P.157

    https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-07-2022-0110 [Citations: 0]
  7. The Impact of Speculation on Commodity Futures A Review of the Findings of 100 Empirical Studies

    Haase, Marco | Seiler, Yvonne | Zimmermann, Heinz

    SSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. (2016), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2729452 [Citations: 0]
  8. Speculative activity and returns volatility of Chinese agricultural commodity futures

    Bohl, Martin T. | Siklos, Pierre L. | Wellenreuther, Claudia

    Journal of Asian Economics, Vol. 54 (2018), Iss. P.69

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.003 [Citations: 29]
  9. The impact of speculation on commodity futures markets – A review of the findings of 100 empirical studies

    Haase, Marco | Seiler Zimmermann, Yvonne | Zimmermann, Heinz

    Journal of Commodity Markets, Vol. 3 (2016), Iss. 1 P.1

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2016.07.006 [Citations: 62]