THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 160.79.111.104 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Close Search Advanced
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938

Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938
Read Now
Download (PDF)

Year:    2018

Author:    McAdam, Mark, Kolev, Stefan, Dekker, Erwin

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 138 (2018), Iss. 3-4 : pp. 185–197

Abstract

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.3-4.185

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 138 (2018), Iss. 3-4 : pp. 185–197

Published online:    2018-07

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    13

Author Details

McAdam, Mark

Kolev, Stefan

Dekker, Erwin

  1. An “Ordo-Thinker” on the Left: Jan Tinbergen on the National and International Economic Order

    Dekker, Erwin

    History of Political Economy, Vol. 54 (2022), Iss. 4 P.689

    https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-9895888 [Citations: 2]

  2. Carl Menger’s Smithian contributions to German political economy

    Kolev, Stefan | Dekker, Erwin

    The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 36 (2023), Iss. 2 P.247

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-022-00602-y [Citations: 3]

  3. Introduction to Special Issue “The Jahrbuch: The First 150 Years”

    Grudev, Lachezar | Kolev, Stefan

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 4 P.273

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.4.273 [Citations: 0]

  1. Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Ashford, R. 2004. “What Is Socioeconomics?” San Diego Law Review 41 (5): 5–10.  Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, J. G. 2003. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” History of Economic Ideas 1 (2): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. E. and P. Martin. 1999. “Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences.” NBER Working Paper No. 6904.  Google Scholar
  5. Biddle, J. E. and D. S. ⁠Hamermesh. 2017. “Theory and Measurement: Emergence, Consolidation, and Erosion of a Consensus.” History of Political Economy 49 (Annual Supplement): 34–57.  Google Scholar
  6. Brintzinger, K.-R. 1996. Die Nationalökonomie an den Universitäten Freiburg, Heidelberg und Tübingen 1918–1945: Eine institutionenhistorische, vergleichende Studie der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten und Abteilungen südwestdeutscher Universitäten. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.  Google Scholar
  7. Broadberry, S. ⁠and C. Burhop. 2010. “Real Wages and Labor Productivity in Britain and Germany, 1871–1938: A Unified Approach to the International Comparison of Living Standards.” Journal of Economic History 70 (2): 400–27.  Google Scholar
  8. Davis, J. B. and W. Dolfsma, eds. 2015. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.  Google Scholar
  9. Glaeser, J. 2014. Der Werturteilsstreit in der deutschen Nationalökonomie: Max Weber, Werner Sombart und die Ideale der Sozialpolitik. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  10. Goldschmidt, N., E. Grimmer-Solem, and J. Zweynert. 2016. “On the Purpose and Aims of the Journal of Contextual Economics.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (1): 1–14.  Google Scholar
  11. Halbweiss, W. W. 1983. Politische Ökonomie: Entwicklung und Wandlungen. Freiburg: Haufe.  Google Scholar
  12. Hedtke, R., ed. 2015. Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  13. Hellmich, S. ⁠N. 2017. “What is Socioeconomics? An Overview of Theories, Methods, and Themes in the Field.” Forum for Social Economics 46 (1): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  14. Hutchison, T. W. 1988. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144 (3): 527–31.  Google Scholar
  15. Kolev, S. ⁠2018. “Early Economic Sociology and Contextual Economics: The Weber-Wieser Connection.” Journal of Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch 138 (1): 1–30.  Google Scholar
  16. Koopmans, T. C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72.  Google Scholar
  17. McAdam, M. and M. Störring. 2016. “Bringing Schmoller to America: Notes on the Translation of ‘The Idea of Justice in Political Economy.’” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (4): 361–76.  Google Scholar
  18. Mikl-Horke, G. 2011. “Was ist Sozioökonomie? Von der Sozialökonomie der Klassiker zur Sozioökonomie der Gegenwart.” In Sozioökonomie: Die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft, edited by G. Mikl-Horke, 19–57. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  19. Milford, K. 2015. “Zur Entwicklung der Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Universität Wien von 1763 bis 1976.” In Reflexive Innensichten aus der Universität: Disziplinengeschichten zwischen Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik, edited by K. A. Fröschl, G. B. Müller, T. Olechowski, and B. Schmidt-Lauber, 341–54. Göttingen: V&R unipress.  Google Scholar
  20. Müller, K. O. W. 1994. “Zum Vermächtnis der sozialrechtlichen Schule der Nationalökonomie: Überlegungen zum Werk Karl Diehls.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 35 (2): 121–30.  Google Scholar
  21. Rohac, D. 2019. In Defense of Globalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  22. Schmoller, G. 1881. “Ueber Zweck und Ziele des Jahrbuchs.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 5 (1): 1–18.  Google Scholar
  23. Seager, H. R. 1893. “Economics at Berlin and Vienna.” Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 236–62.  Google Scholar
  24. Senn, P. 1989. “What Has Happened to Gustav von Schmoller in English?” History of Economics Society Bulletin 11 (2): 252–95.  Google Scholar
  25. Simon, N., ed. 1998. Duncker & Humblot: Verlagsbibliographie 1798–1945. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  26. Streissler, E. W. 1990. “The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, edited by B. J. Caldwell, 31–68. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Tribe, K. 2014. “What is Social Economics?” History of European Ideas 40 (5): 714–33.  Google Scholar
  28. Wegner, G. 2020. “Reassessing the Dependence of Capitalism on Democracy–The Case of Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16 (3): 337–54.  Google Scholar
  29. Zweynert, J. 2013. “How German is German Neo-liberalism?” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 109–25.  Google Scholar
  30. Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  31. Ashford, R. 2004. “What Is Socioeconomics?” San Diego Law Review 41 (5): 5–10.  Google Scholar
  32. Backhaus, J. G. 2003. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” History of Economic Ideas 1 (2): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  33. Baldwin, R. E. and P. Martin. 1999. “Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences.” NBER Working Paper No. 6904.  Google Scholar
  34. Biddle, J. E. and D. S. ?Hamermesh. 2017. “Theory and Measurement: Emergence, Consolidation, and Erosion of a Consensus.” History of Political Economy 49 (Annual Supplement): 34–57.  Google Scholar
  35. Brintzinger, K.-R. 1996. Die Nationalökonomie an den Universitäten Freiburg, Heidelberg und Tübingen 1918–1945: Eine institutionenhistorische, vergleichende Studie der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten und Abteilungen südwestdeutscher Universitäten. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.  Google Scholar
  36. Broadberry, S. ?and C. Burhop. 2010. “Real Wages and Labor Productivity in Britain and Germany, 1871–1938: A Unified Approach to the International Comparison of Living Standards.” Journal of Economic History 70 (2): 400–27.  Google Scholar
  37. Davis, J. B. and W. Dolfsma, eds. 2015. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.  Google Scholar
  38. Glaeser, J. 2014. Der Werturteilsstreit in der deutschen Nationalökonomie: Max Weber, Werner Sombart und die Ideale der Sozialpolitik. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  39. Goldschmidt, N., E. Grimmer-Solem, and J. Zweynert. 2016. “On the Purpose and Aims of the Journal of Contextual Economics.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (1): 1–14.  Google Scholar
  40. Halbweiss, W. W. 1983. Politische Ökonomie: Entwicklung und Wandlungen. Freiburg: Haufe.  Google Scholar
  41. Hedtke, R., ed. 2015. Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  42. Hellmich, S. ?N. 2017. “What is Socioeconomics? An Overview of Theories, Methods, and Themes in the Field.” Forum for Social Economics 46 (1): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  43. Hutchison, T. W. 1988. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144 (3): 527–31.  Google Scholar
  44. Kolev, S. ?2018. “Early Economic Sociology and Contextual Economics: The Weber-Wieser Connection.” Journal of Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch 138 (1): 1–30.  Google Scholar
  45. Koopmans, T. C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72.  Google Scholar
  46. McAdam, M. and M. Störring. 2016. “Bringing Schmoller to America: Notes on the Translation of ‘The Idea of Justice in Political Economy.’” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (4): 361–76.  Google Scholar
  47. Mikl-Horke, G. 2011. “Was ist Sozioökonomie? Von der Sozialökonomie der Klassiker zur Sozioökonomie der Gegenwart.” In Sozioökonomie: Die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft, edited by G. Mikl-Horke, 19–57. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  48. Milford, K. 2015. “Zur Entwicklung der Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Universität Wien von 1763 bis 1976.” In Reflexive Innensichten aus der Universität: Disziplinengeschichten zwischen Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik, edited by K. A. Fröschl, G. B. Müller, T. Olechowski, and B. Schmidt-Lauber, 341–54. Göttingen: V&R unipress.  Google Scholar
  49. Müller, K. O. W. 1994. “Zum Vermächtnis der sozialrechtlichen Schule der Nationalökonomie: Überlegungen zum Werk Karl Diehls.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 35 (2): 121–30.  Google Scholar
  50. Rohac, D. 2019. In Defense of Globalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  51. Schmoller, G. 1881. “Ueber Zweck und Ziele des Jahrbuchs.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 5 (1): 1–18.  Google Scholar
  52. Seager, H. R. 1893. “Economics at Berlin and Vienna.” Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 236–62.  Google Scholar
  53. Senn, P. 1989. “What Has Happened to Gustav von Schmoller in English?” History of Economics Society Bulletin 11 (2): 252–95.  Google Scholar
  54. Simon, N., ed. 1998. Duncker & Humblot: Verlagsbibliographie 1798–1945. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  55. Streissler, E. W. 1990. “The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, edited by B. J. Caldwell, 31–68. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  56. Tribe, K. 2014. “What is Social Economics?” History of European Ideas 40 (5): 714–33.  Google Scholar
  57. Wegner, G. 2020. “Reassessing the Dependence of Capitalism on Democracy–The Case of Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16 (3): 337–54.  Google Scholar
  58. Zweynert, J. 2013. “How German is German Neo-liberalism?” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 109–25.  Google Scholar

Section Title Page Action Price
Mark McAdam / Stefan Kolev / Erwin Dekker: Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896 –1938 1
1. Introduction to the Translations of Selected Classicsfrom Schmollers Jahrbuch 1
2. Motivation for Our Text Selection 5
3. Comments on the Translation Processand Editorial Decisions 1
4. Acknowledgments 1
References 1