Über den wahren Begriff der Kantischen Rechtsphilosophie und die richtige Art ihre Probleme aufzulösen
Year: 2020
Author: Schick, Stefan
Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 28 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 85–114
Abstract
The Doctrine of Right is one of Kant’s most disputed works: Defamed as an alleged sign of Kant’s emerging senility by Schopenhauer, it is now considered a classic of both philosophy of right and philosophy of the state. But to this day, even the reliability of the original edition of the Doctrine of Right is an object of learned and heated discussions. According to Martin Heuser’s recently published study Zur Positivität des Rechts in der kritischen Naturrechtslehre Immanuel Kants the whole scholarly disputes on Kant’s Doctrine of Right originate from a complete misunderstanding of the Doctrine’s very methodology, the method of synthetic a priori knowledge. In a critical discussion of Heuser’s book, this paper hence re-reads Kant’s Doctrine of Right. It first takes into consideration some methodological issues with the Doctrine of Right and its interpretation. Afterwards, it investigates the metaphysical character of Kant’s philosophy of right. In a further step, it confronts Kant’s intrapersonal foundation of right with its interpersonal foundation by both Fichte and Hegel. Thereupon, it analyzes the status of private law, the state, and the relation of natural law and positive law in Kant’s Doctrine of Right. The paper ends with a critical examination of Kant’s matrimonial law and his rejection of any right of resistance.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: German
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/jre.28.1.85
Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 28 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 85–114
Published online: 2020-01
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 30
Author Details
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Schick: Über den wahren Begriff der Kantischen Rechtsphilosophie und die richtige Art ihre Probleme aufzulösen | 85 | ||
| I. Methodologische Vorüberlegungen zur Rechtslehre | 87 | ||
| II. Was heißt Metaphysik des Rechts? | 91 | ||
| III. Intrapersonalität oder Interpersonalität? | 85 | ||
| IV. Der Status des Privatrechts | 85 | ||
| V. Der Staat: Praktische Notwendigkeit oder Not- und Behelfswerk? | 85 | ||
| VI. Positives Recht und Naturrecht: Ein antinomisches Verhältnis | 86 | ||
| VII. Das Widerstandsrecht | 86 | ||
| VIII. Unzeitgemäße Betrachtungen zum Eherecht für ein postmetaphysisches Zeitalter | 86 | ||
| Resümee | 87 | ||
| Summary | 87 |