THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.145.94.50 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Price Bargaining and the Business Cycle

Price Bargaining and the Business Cycle

Year:    2020

Author:    Wesselbaum, Dennis

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 66 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–27

Abstract

This paper models a segmented production sector with price bargaining between the intermediate good firm and the final good firm. We show how to incorporate price bargaining in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model and discuss its macroeconomic implications. Estimating the model on U.S. data using Bayesian methods, we find that the intermediate good firm has 50 percent of the bargaining power. We find that the size of the bargaining power determines the quantitative and qualitative macroeconomic effects.

Further, we quantify the size of switching costs: they are equal to about two percent of output. Shocks to switching costs are specific to this model and generate sizable macroeconomic fluctuations.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    German

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/aeq.66.1.1

Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 66 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–27

Published online:    2020-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    27

Keywords:    Bayesian Estimation Business Cycles Monetary Policy Price Bargaining Switching Costs E31 E52 L10

Author Details

Wesselbaum, Dennis

  1. Beckert, W. (2009): “Empirical Analysis of Buyer Power,” CEMMAP Working Paper, No. 17/09.  Google Scholar
  2. Besanko, D./Dubé, J.-P./Gupta, S. (2005): “Own-Brand and Cross-Brand Retail Pass-through,” Marketing Science 24(1), 123–137.  Google Scholar
  3. Bils, M./Klenow, P. (2004): “Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices,” Journal of Political Economy 112(5), 947–985.  Google Scholar
  4. Blinder, A. S./Canetti, E. R. D./Lebow, D. E./Rudd, J. B. (1998): “Asking about Prices: A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness,” Russell Sage, NY.  Google Scholar
  5. Brown, A./Merkl, C./Snower, D. J. (2015): “An Incentive Theory of Matching,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 19(3), 643–668.  Google Scholar
  6. Corominas-Bosch, M. (2004): On Two-Sided Network Markets,” Journal of Economic Theory 115, 35–77.  Google Scholar
  7. Erdös, P./Renyi, A. (1960): “On the Evolution of Random Graphs,” Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5, 17–61.  Google Scholar
  8. Erdös, P./Renyi, A. (1959): “On Random Graphs I,” Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen 6, 290–297.  Google Scholar
  9. Fabiani, S./Hernando, I./Loupias, C./Mathä, T. Y./Sabbatini, R./Landau, B./Stokman, A. C. J./Druant, M./Kwapil, C./Stahl, H./Martins, F. (2005): “The Pricing Behaviour of Firms in the Euro Area: New Survey Evidence,” Working Paper Series 535, European Central Bank.  Google Scholar
  10. Galí, J. (2008): “Monetary Policy, Inflation, and the Business Cycle,” Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  11. Galí, J./Rabanal, P. (2004): “Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations: How Well Does the Real Business Cycle Model Fit Postwar U.S. Data?,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2004 19, 225–288.  Google Scholar
  12. Inderst, R./Mazzarotto, N. (2006): “Buyer Power: Sources, Consequences, and Policy Responses,” mimeo.  Google Scholar
  13. Kleshchelski, I./Vincent, N. (2009): “Market Share and Price Rigidity,” Journal of Monetary Economics 56(3), 344–352.  Google Scholar
  14. Krause, M./Lubik, T. (2007): “The (Ir)Relevance of Real Wage Rigidity in the New Keynesian Model with Search Frictions,” Journal of Monetary Economics 54(3), 706–727.  Google Scholar
  15. Lubik, T./Schorfheide, F. (2004): “Testing for Indeterminacy: an Application to U.S. Monetary Policy,” American Economic Review 94, 190–217.  Google Scholar
  16. Mathä, T. Y./Pierrard, O. (2011): “Search in the Product market and the Real Business Cycle,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 35(8), 1172–1191.  Google Scholar
  17. Nakamura, E./Steinsson, J. 2011. “Price Setting in Forward-Looking Customer Markets,” Journal of Monetary Economics 58(3), 220–233.  Google Scholar
  18. Peltzman, S. (2000): “Prices Rise Faster than they Fall,” Journal of Political Economy 108(3), 466–502.  Google Scholar
  19. Rapoport, A. (1957): “Contribution to the Theory of Random and Biased Nets,” Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 19, 257–277.  Google Scholar
  20. Rotemberg, J. (1982): “Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output,” Review of Economic Studies 49(4), 517–531.  Google Scholar
  21. Smets, F./Wouters, R. (2007): “Shocks and Frictions in U.S. Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach,” American Economic Review 97(3), 586–606.  Google Scholar
  22. Uzzi, B. (1997): “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1), 35–67.  Google Scholar
  23. Weisbuch, G./Kirman, A./Herreiner, D. K. (2000): “Market Organisation and Trading Relationships,” Economic Journal 110(463), 411–436.  Google Scholar
  24. Weisbuch, G./Kirman, A./Herreiner, D. K. (1996): “Market Organization,” Discussion Paper Serie B 391, University of Bonn.  Google Scholar

Section Title Page Action Price
Dennis Wesselbaum: Price Bargaining and the Business Cycle 1
Abstract 1
1. Introduction 1
2. Model Derivation 4
2.1 Consumption 4
2.2 Production 6
2.3 Price Bargaining 8
2.4 Equilibrium and Calibration 1
3. Estimation 1
3.1 Methodology, Data, and Priors 1
3.2 Posterior Estimates 1
3.3 Impulse Response Functions 1
4. Inspecting the Mechanism 1
4.1 Technology Shocks 1
4.2 Switching Cost Shock 2
5. Conclusion 2
References 2
Appendix 2