Year: 2019
Author: Heinz, Wolfgang S.
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 62 (2019), Iss. 1 : pp. 43–80
Abstract
This article approaches the matter of institutional reform of the United Nations Human Rights Council from an international relations perspective. A well-known tension exists between State representatives acting for their governments in international organisations, but whose decisions are presented as UN policies. The latter should be guided primarily by the UN Charter and public international law. However, in reality, different worldviews and foreign policy considerations play a more significant role. In a comprehensive stock-take, the article looks at four major dimensions of the Council, starting with structure and dynamics and major trends, followed by its country and thematic activities, and the role of key actors. Council reform proposals from both States and civil society are explored. Whilst the intergovernmental body remains the most important authority responsible for the protection of human rights in the international sphere, it has also been the subject of considerable criticism. Although it has made considerable progress towards enlarging its coverage and taking on more challenging human rights crises, among some of its major weaknesses are the election of human rights-unfriendly countries into its ranks, the failure to apply stronger sanctions on large, politically influential countries in the South and North, and lack of influence on human rights crises and chronic human rights problems in certain countries. Whilst various reform proposals have emerged from States and NGOs, other more far reaching propositions are under sometimes difficult negotiations. In the mid- to long-term, the UN human rights machinery can only have a stronger and more lasting impact if support from national/local actors and coalitions in politics and society can be strengthened.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.62.1.43
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 62 (2019), Iss. 1 : pp. 43–80
Published online: 2019-01
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 38
Keywords: China Common Foreign and Security Policy Foreign Policy Human Rights Human Rights Council International Organisation Monitoring National Human Rights Institutions Treaty bodies United Nations United States
Author Details
-
Analysis of the Effectiveness of International Law in Global Environmental Relations from the Perspective of International Institutional Theory
Yu, Zeyang
kaifa, Zhao
Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Vol. 2022 (2022), Iss. P.1
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1505040 [Citations: 0]
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolfgang S. Heinz: An International Relations Perspective on the Reform Needs of the Human Rights Council | 43 | ||
| I. The U.S. Withdrawal from HRC Membership in 2018 | 44 | ||
| II. The HRC, its Organs, and Some Major Trends | 46 | ||
| A. The New Human Rights Council | 46 | ||
| B. Main Institutional Arrangements | 48 | ||
| 1. Composition, Membership | 48 | ||
| 2. Becoming a Member of the HRC | 48 | ||
| C. Plenary Sessions | 52 | ||
| D. Dealing With Country Situations | 53 | ||
| E. Thematic Issues | 57 | ||
| F. Universal Periodic Review (UPR) | 58 | ||
| G. Other Actors in HRC Debates: OHCHR, Civil Society/NGOs, NHRIs | 60 | ||
| III. Key Challenges | 61 | ||
| A. Cooperation Between the UN and Member States, Particularly Access to Countries | 61 | ||
| B. Politics and Politicisation | 63 | ||
| C. Special Sessions | 65 | ||
| D. Controversial Issues | 66 | ||
| E. Contesting Narratives | 68 | ||
| 1. Russian Federation: Traditional Values, Protection of the Family | 69 | ||
| 2. China: Cooperation and Public Criticism of Countries | 70 | ||
| IV. Reform Proposals | 72 | ||
| A. Overview | 72 | ||
| B. Proposals From Inter-Governmental Dialogue Meetings (Glion Human Rights Dialogue) | 75 | ||
| C. Civil Society Proposals | 76 | ||
| V. Concluding Remarks | 77 |