Year: 2018
Author: von Ungern-Sternberg, Antje
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 239–266
Abstract
Artificial agents – from autonomous cars and weapon systems to social bots, from profiling and tracking programmes to risk assessment software predicting criminal recidivism or voting behaviour – challenge general principles of national and international law. This article addresses three of these principles: responsibility, explainability, and autonomy. Responsibility requires that actors be held accountable for their actions, including damages and breaches of law. Responsibility for actions and decisions taken by artificial agents can be secured by resorting to strict or objective liability schemes, which do not require human fault and other human factors, or by relocating human fault, i.e. by holding programmers, supervisors, or standard setters accountable. ‘Explainability’ is a term used to characterise that even if artificial agents produce useful and reliable results, it must be explainable how these results are generated. Lawyers have to define those areas of law that require an explanation for artificial agents’ activities, ranging from human rights interferences to, possibly, any form of automated decision-making that affects an individual. Finally, the many uses of artificial agents also raise questions regarding several aspects of autonomy, including privacy and data protection, individuality, and freedom from manipulation. Yet, artificial agents do not only challenge existing principles of law, they can also strengthen responsibility, explainability, and autonomy.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: English
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.60.1.239
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 239–266
Published online: 2018-01
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 28
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence Autonomous Agent Responsibility Right to Explanation European General Data Protection Regulation Automated Decision-Making Autonomy Manipulation
Author Details
-
The Democratic Inclusion of Artificial Intelligence? Exploring the Patiency, Agency and Relational Conditions for Demos Membership
Beckman, Ludvig
Rosenberg, Jonas Hultin
Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 35 (2022), Iss. 2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00525-3 [Citations: 0]
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antje von Ungern-Sternberg: Artificial Agents and General Principles of Law | 1 | ||
| I. Introduction | 1 | ||
| II. Technology | 5 | ||
| III. Responsibility | 7 | ||
| A. Responsibility Without Human Fault | 9 | ||
| B. Relocating Human Fault | 1 | ||
| IV. Explainability | 1 | ||
| A. Human Rights | 1 | ||
| B. Other Sources of a Duty to Explain | 1 | ||
| V. Autonomy | 2 | ||
| A. Privacy and Data Protection | 2 | ||
| B. Individuality | 2 | ||
| C. Manipulation | 2 | ||
| VI. Conclusion | 2 |