THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 18.222.194.128 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Vorsatz als Wissen?

Vorsatz als Wissen?

Year:    2021

Author:    Mañalich R., Juan Pablo

Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 29 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 177–188

Abstract

The traditional understanding of the criminal law’s concept of dolus is grounded on its definition as the conjunction of a volitional and a cognitive attitude towards the satisfaction of the abstract description that specifies the corresponding offense. Although so-called “cognitivist” conceptions persuasively argue for the redundancy of the purported volitional component, the theoretical adequacy of the recourse to the concept of knowledge is very rarely called into question. The display of a teleological-analytical model for clarifying the general structure of a criminal offense can show that, according to its distinctively ascriptive function, the concept of dolus ought to be taken as requiring a predictive belief referred to an (unjustified) instance of the relevant actus reus, whereas such a predictive belief need not satisfy the semantic and epistemic conditions for an attribution of knowledge.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    German

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/jre.29.1.177

Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 29 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 177–188

Published online:    2021-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    12

Keywords:    Law Recht Droit

Author Details

Mañalich R., Juan Pablo

Section Title Page Action Price
Juan Pablo Mañalich R., Vorsatz als Wissen? Zu einigen semantischen und epistemischen Voraussetzungen der subjektiven Zurechnung Vorsatz als Wissen? 177
I. Die negative Zurechnungsfunktion des Intentionsbegriffs 177
II. Vorsatz als prädiktive Vorstellung 179
III. Exakte Normkenntnis als hypothetische Vorbedingung der Vorsatzzuschreibung 180
IV. Die Irrelevanz der epistemischen Rechtfertigung der prädiktiven Vorstellung 184
V. Die Irrelevanz der Wahrheit der prädiktiven Vorstellung 177
Summary 177