THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.128.247.220 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Close Search Advanced
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”

Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”
Preview
Add to basket

Year:    2022

Author:    Kovacs, George

Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, Vol. 38 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 105–120

Abstract

Lessons from Heidegger’s Attempt to Rethink Science in his “Beiträge”

Heidegger’s understanding of the relationship between philosophy and science is expressed in his claim that they are not hostile towards each other, i. e., that philosophy is neither for nor against science, though they differ in ambition, strength, and methodology. Their interaction, as this essay suggests, may contribute to the range and diversification of philosophical thinking and to a deeper grasp of the strength and boundary (potential and limitation) of scientific inquiry and knowing. Heidegger’s rethinking of science, especially in his twenty-four “propositions about science”, includes a critical assessment of the status of science in the epoch of modernity; it discerns (discovers, discloses) the truth of science in its relation to the measure of truth in beings, and to the truth of be-ing. The entire inquiry at hand is grounded in be-ing-historical thinking and mindfulness.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/heist.38.1.105

Heidegger Studies / Heidegger Studien / Etudes Heideggeriennes / Studi Heideggeriani, Vol. 38 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 105–120

Published online:    2022-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    16

Keywords:    science philosophy being-historical-thinking truth

Author Details

Kovacs, George

  1. Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. Transzendenz und Ereignis. Heideggers Beiträge zur Philosophie. Ein Kommentar. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2019.  Google Scholar
  2. Gennaro, Ivo De. “Sciency of Being and Ethics for Science in Heidegger’s Black Notebooks”, in: Heidegger Studies 37 (2021): 87 – 118.  Google Scholar
  3. Kovacs, George. “An Invitation to Think through and with Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie”, in: Heidegger Studies 12 (1996): 17 – 36.  Google Scholar
  4. Kovacs, George. Thinking and Be-ing in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Bucharest: Zeta Books 2015.  Google Scholar
  5. Kovacs, George. “The Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s Zum Ereignis-Denken”, in: Heidegger Studies 35 (2019): 175 – 192.  Google Scholar
  6. Schalow, Frank. Departures: At the Crossroads between Heidegger and Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2013.  Google Scholar
  7. Schalow, Frank. “Being-Historical Thinking and the Ontological Difference: Extending Heidegger’s Auseinanderstetzung with Kant”, in: Existentia XXIX/3 – 4 (2019): 193 – 208.  Google Scholar
  8. Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. Transzendenz und Ereignis. Heideggers Beiträge zur Philosophie. Ein Kommentar. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2019.  Google Scholar
  9. Gennaro, Ivo De. “Sciency of Being and Ethics for Science in Heidegger’s Black Notebooks”, in: Heidegger Studies 37 (2021): 87 – 118.  Google Scholar
  10. Kovacs, George. “An Invitation to Think through and with Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie”, in: Heidegger Studies 12 (1996): 17 – 36.  Google Scholar
  11. Kovacs, George. Thinking and Be-ing in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Bucharest: Zeta Books 2015.  Google Scholar
  12. Kovacs, George. “The Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s Zum Ereignis-Denken”, in: Heidegger Studies 35 (2019): 175 – 192.  Google Scholar
  13. Schalow, Frank. Departures: At the Crossroads between Heidegger and Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2013.  Google Scholar
  14. Schalow, Frank. “Being-Historical Thinking and the Ontological Difference: Extending Heidegger’s Auseinanderstetzung with Kant”, in: Existentia XXIX/3 – 4 (2019): 193 – 208.  Google Scholar
  15. Herrmann, Friedrich-Wilhelm von. Transzendenz und Ereignis. Heideggers Beiträge zur Philosophie. Ein Kommentar. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann 2019.  Google Scholar
  16. Gennaro, Ivo De. “Sciency of Being and Ethics for Science in Heidegger’s Black Notebooks”, in: Heidegger Studies 37 (2021): 87 – 118.  Google Scholar
  17. Kovacs, George. “An Invitation to Think through and with Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie”, in: Heidegger Studies 12 (1996): 17 – 36.  Google Scholar
  18. Kovacs, George. Thinking and Be-ing in Heidegger’s Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Bucharest: Zeta Books 2015.  Google Scholar
  19. Kovacs, George. “The Ontological Difference in Heidegger’s Zum Ereignis-Denken”, in: Heidegger Studies 35 (2019): 175 – 192.  Google Scholar
  20. Schalow, Frank. Departures: At the Crossroads between Heidegger and Kant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter 2013.  Google Scholar
  21. Schalow, Frank. “Being-Historical Thinking and the Ontological Difference: Extending Heidegger’s Auseinanderstetzung with Kant”, in: Existentia XXIX/3 – 4 (2019): 193 – 208.  Google Scholar

Section Title Page Action Price
George Kovacs: Lessons from Heidegger's Attempt to Rethink Science in his 105
I. Comprehensive Perspective 105
II. Grounding in Be-ing-historical Thinking 108
III. Main Claims about and Insights into Science 111
IV. Lessons and Concluding Reflection 116
Bibliography 119
Abstract 119
Lessons from Heidegger's Attempt to Rethink Science in his \"Beiträge 119