THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 18.217.19.195 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

The Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian War on Europe’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy

The Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian War on Europe’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy

Year:    2022

Author:    Lööf, Hans, Stephan, Andreas

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 91 (2022), Iss. 3 : pp. 63–82

Abstract

Der russisch-ukrainische Krieg verstärkt die Belastung der Wälder. Internationale Sanktionen treffen Exporte aus Russland und Weißrussland, und der Krieg beeinträchtigt die Holzwirtschaft in der Ukraine stark. Diese drei Länder machten im Jahr 2021 zusammen ein Viertel des weltweiten Holzhandels aus, und Russland war der weltweit größte Exporteur von Nadelholz. Der Krieg erhöht die Abhängigkeit der Europäischen Union (EU) von den eigenen Waldressourcen. Dies erhöht die Herausforderung, ein Gleichgewicht zwischen Wäldern als Kohlenstoffsenke, als Lebensraum für den Erhalt von Biodiversität und als funktionale Ökosysteme einerseits und der wachsenden Nachfrage nach Holz und erneuerbaren Energien andererseits zu erreichen. Dieser Artikel gibt Einblicke in das mögliche Dilemma im Hinblick auf die Erreichung des formulierten Klimaziels der EU, für welches die forstbasierte Bioökonomie eine wichtige Rolle spielt.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    English

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.91.3.63

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 91 (2022), Iss. 3 : pp. 63–82

Published online:    2022-07

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot, Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    20

Keywords:    F18 L73 H70 Q54 Q57 Bioeconomy biodiversity climate-change forest management sustainability

Author Details

Lööf, Hans

Stephan, Andreas

  1. EuroStat (2020): “Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics – 2020 Edition”. In: Luxemburg. Chap. 5: Forestry activities. DOI: 10.2785/143455.  Google Scholar
  2. FAO (2020): Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main report. Report. Rome, FAO. DOI: 10.4060/ca9825en.  Google Scholar
  3. Finch, Deborah M., Jack L. Butler, Justin B. Runyon, Christopher J. Fettig, Francis F. Kilkenny, Shibu Jose, Susan J. Frankel, Samuel A. Cushman, Richard C. Cobb, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Jeffrey A. Hicke, and Sybill K. Amelon (2021): “Effects of Climate Change on Invasive Species”. In: Invasive Species in Forests and Rangelands of the United States: A Comprehensive Science Synthesis for the United States Forest Sector. Ed. by Therese M. Poland, Toral Patel-Weynand, Deborah M. Finch, Chelcy Ford Miniat, Deborah C. Hayes, and Vanessa M. Lopez. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 57 – 83. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1_4.  Google Scholar
  4. Grassi, Giacomo, Jo House, Frank Dentener, Sandro Federici, Michel den Elzen, and Jim Penman (2017): “The key role of forests in meeting climate targets requires science for credible mitigation”. In: Nature Climate Change 7.3, pp. 220 – 226.  Google Scholar
  5. Griscom, Bronson, Justin Adams, Peter W. Ellis, Richard A. Houghton, Guy Lomax, Daniela A. Miteva, William H. Schlesinger, David Shoch, Juha V. Siikamäki, Pete Smith, Peter Woodbury, Chris Zganjar, Allen Blackman, Joaõ Campari, Richard T. Conant, Christopher Delgado, Patricia Elias, Trisha Gopalakrishna, Marisa R. Hamsik, Mario Herrero, Joseph Kiesecker, Emily Landis, Lars Laestadius, Sara M. Leavitt, Susan Minnemeyer, Stephen Polasky, Peter Potapov, Francis E. Putz, Jonathan Sanderman, Marcel Silvius, Eva Wollenberg, and Joseph Fargione (2017): “Natural climate solutions”. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114.44, pp. 11645 – 11650. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710465114. eprint: https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1710465114. URL: https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1710465114.  Google Scholar
  6. Gustavsson, L., T. Nguyen, R. Sathre, and U. Y. A. Tettey (2021): “Climate effects of forestry and substitution of concrete buildings and fossil energy”. In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 136, p. 110435. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.1104 35.  Google Scholar
  7. Hurmekoski, Elias, Tanja Myllyviita, Jyri Seppälä, Tero Heinonen, Antti Kilpeläinen, Timo Pukkala, Tuomas Mattila, Lauri Hetemäki, Antti Asikainen, and Heli Peltola (2020): “Impact of structural changes in wood-using industries on net carbon emissions in Finland”. In: Journal of Industrial Ecology 24.4, pp. 899 – 912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12981. eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jiec.12981. URL: https://onlinelibra ry.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jiec.12981.  Google Scholar
  8. IPCC (2018): Global Warming of 1.5◦: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5◦ C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Ed. by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, J. Skea D. Roberts, P. R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Pean, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J. B. R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M. I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157940.  Google Scholar
  9. Jonsson, Ragnar, Francesca Rinaldi, Roberto Pilli, Giulia Fiorese, Elias Hurmekoski, Noemi Cazzaniga, Nicolas Robert, and Andrea Camia (2021): “Boosting the EU forest- based bioeconomy: Market, climate, and employment impacts”. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change 163, p. 120478. ISSN: 0040 – 1625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120478. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520313044.  Google Scholar
  10. Leskinen, Pekka, Giuseppe Cardellini, Sara Gonzalez-Garcia, Elias Hurmekoski, Roger Sathre, Jyri Seppälä, Carolyn Smyth, Tobias Stern, and Pieter Johannes Verkerk (2018): Substitution effects of wood-based products in climate change mitigation. From Science to Policy 7. European Forest Institute. DOI: 10.36333/fs07.  Google Scholar
  11. Leskinen, Pekka, Marcus Lindner, Pieter Johannes Verkerk, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Jo Van Brusselen, Elena Kulikova, Mariana Hassegawa, and BJW Lerink (2020): Russian forests and climate change. European Forest Institute.  Google Scholar
  12. Lindner, Marcus, Joanne B Fitzgerald, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Christopher Reyer, Sylvain Delzon, Ernst van Der Maaten, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Petra Lasch, Jeannette Eggers, Marieke van Der Maaten-Theunissen, et al. (2014): “Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management?” In: Journal of environmental management 146, pp. 69 – 83.  Google Scholar
  13. Muys, B., P. Angelstam, J. Bauhus, L. Bouriaud, H. Jactel, H. Kraigher, J. Müller, N. Pettorelli, E. Pötzelsberger, E. Primmer, M. Svoboda, B. J. Thorsen, and K. Van Meerbeek (2022): Forest Biodiversity in Europe. From Science to Policy 13. European Forest Institute. DOI: 10.36333/fs13.  Google Scholar
  14. Petersson, Hans, David Ellison, Alex Appiah Mensah, Göran Berndes, Gustaf Egnell, Mattias Lundblad, Tomas Lundmark, Anders Lundström, Johan Stendahl, and Per-Erik Wikberg (2022): “On the role of forests and the forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden”. In: GCB Bioenergy 14.7, pp. 793 – 813. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-019-0591-9.  Google Scholar
  15. Rockström, Johan, Owen Gaffney, Joeri Rogelj, Malte Meinshausen, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, and Hans Joachim Schellnhuber (2017): “A roadmap for rapid decarbonization”. In: Science 355.6331, pp. 1269 – 1271.  Google Scholar
  16. Roe, Stephanie, Charlotte Streck, Michael Obersteiner, Stefan Frank, Bronson Griscom, Laurent Drouet, Oliver Fricko, Mykola Gusti, Nancy Harris, Tomoko Hasegawa, et al. (2019): “Contribution of the land sector to a 1.5 C world”. In: Nature Climate Change 9.11, pp. 817 – 828.  Google Scholar
  17. Ronzon, Tevecia, Stephan Piotrowski, Saulius Tamosiunas, Lara Dammer, Michael Carus, and Robert M’barek (2020): “Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU”. In: Sustainability 12.11. ISSN: 2071 – 1050. DOI: 10.3390/su12114507. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/11/4507.  Google Scholar
  18. Seidl, Rupert and Kristina Blennow (2012): “Pervasive Growth Reduction in Norway Spruce Forests following Wind Disturbance”. In: PLOS ONE 7.3, pp. 1 – 8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033301.  Google Scholar
  19. Smyth, CE, Z Xu, TC Lemprière, and WA Kurz (2020): “Climate change mitigation in British Columbia’s forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts”. In: Carbon balance and management 15.1, pp. 1 – 22.  Google Scholar
  20. Soimakallio, Sampo, Tuomo Kalliokoski, Aleksi Lehtonen, and Olli Salminen (2021): “On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution”. In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 26.1, pp. 1 – 17.  Google Scholar
  21. Swedish Forest Agency (2021): Sustainable boreal forest management – challenges and opportunities for climate change mitigation. REPORT 2021/11. Jönköping. URL: htt ps://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/globalassets/om-oss/rapporter/rapporter-2021202020192018/rapport-2021-11-sustainable-boreal-forest-management-challenges-and-opportunities-for-climate-change-mitigation-002.pdf.  Google Scholar
  22. UNECE/FAO (2021): Forest Products Annual Market Review 2020 – 2021. Report ECE/TIM/SP/52. URL: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2 021-11/2114516E_Inside_Final_web.pdf.  Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Environment Programme (2019): Emissions gap report 2019. United Nations Environment Programme.  Google Scholar
  24. Valade, Aude, Valentin Bellassen, Claire Magand, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert (2017): “Sustaining the sequestration efficiency of the European forest sector”. In: Forest Ecology and Management 405, pp. 44 – 55.  Google Scholar

Section Title Page Action Price
Hans Lööf / Andreas Stephan: The Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian War on Europe’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy 63
1 Introduction 64
2 The Status of EU Forests and Wood Production 66
3 Russia’s Timber and Wood Exports and the Impact of the War-Related Sanctions on the EU’s Bioeconomy Sector 72
4 Importance of Forest-Based Sectors for EU’s Climate Goals 73
5 Discussion and Policy Insights 75
6 Conclusion 78
Appendix 78
References 80