THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.22.27.106 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Die Entwicklung langfristiger Kreditzinssätze: Eine empirische Analyse

Year:    1996

Author:    Nautz, Dieter, Wolters, Jürgen

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 29 (1996), Iss. 4 : pp. 481–510

Abstract

The Development of Long-Term Credit Rates: An Empirical Analysis

This paper investigates the development of five-year and ten-year mortgage loan and capital market rates. Cointegration tests imply that these interest rates are separated by maturity: each mortgage loan rate is cointegrated with its refinancing rate, i.e. the capital market rate with the same maturity. Whereas the relation between two interest rates of different maturities which is implied by the expectations hypothesis of the term structure seems to be weak. However, impulse response functions and a dynamic factor analysis reveal that there are nevertheless level relations between interest rates of different maturity. It is demonstrated that the consideration of these more complex relations improves the forecast of the five-year mortgage loan rate.

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    Multiple languages

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.29.4.481

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 29 (1996), Iss. 4 : pp. 481–510

Published online:    1996-04

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    30

Author Details

Nautz, Dieter

Wolters, Jürgen

  1. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., Galbraith, J. W. und Hendry, D. F. (1993): Cointegration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. und Mestre, R. (1994): On the Power of Cointegration Tests: Dimension Invariance vs. Common Factors. Mimeo.  Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. Y. und Shiller, R. J. (1987): Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models. Journal of Political Economy, 95: 1062 - 88.  Google Scholar