THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.146.65.73 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Pigou and Buffer Effects in Monetary Economics

Year:    1988

Author:    Knoester, Anthonie

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 21 (1988), Iss. 1 : pp. 92–117

Abstract

Pigou and Buffer Effects in Monetary Economics

This paper discusses the two mainstream monetary views on the direct link between money and real aggregates. The oldest direct link was elaborated by Pigou in 1943 as an alternative to the Keynesian indirect link as formalised in IS-LM models. It is shown how this Pigou effect was elaborated and critised in the postwar period. It is argued that its most important weakness lies in the implicit assumption of monetary equilibrium. The paper suggests that modern disequilibrium analysis provides a far better theoretical foundation for the direct link between money and real aggregates. Such link – being called the buffer effect – fits well into the growing body of economic literature dealing with the so-called buffer stock approach to money.

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    Multiple languages

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.21.1.92

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 21 (1988), Iss. 1 : pp. 92–117

Published online:    1988-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    26

Author Details

Knoester, Anthonie

  1. Andersen, P. S. (1984), The Stability of Money Demand Functions: An Alternative Approach, mimeo, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.  Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, G. C. and Lipsey, R. G. (1958), Monetary and Value Theory: A Critique ofLange and Patinkin, The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 26, no. 69, October, pp. 1 - 22.  Google Scholar
  3. Bank of England (1979), Bank of England Model of the U.K. Economy, Discussion Paper no. 5, London.  Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R. J. (1974), Are Government Bonds Net Wealth? Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, no. 6, November/December, pp. 1095 - 1117.  Google Scholar