Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/config.js
THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 18.220.62.173 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

The Nature of the Theoretical Debate about Monetarism

Year:    1981

Author:    Pippenger, John

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 14 (1981), Iss. 1 : pp. 26–31

Abstract

The Nature of the Theoretical Debate about Monetarism

There is a widespread belief, clearly stated by Benjamin Friedman [1978], that there is no theoretical debate over monetarism. The issues separating monetarists and Keynesians are empirical rather than theoretical. The position taken here is that there is a theoretical debate, but the important theoretical issues are excluded by standard macro models because they assume continuous monetary equilibrium.

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    Multiple languages

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.14.1.26

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 14 (1981), Iss. 1 : pp. 26–31

Published online:    1981-01

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    6

Author Details

Pippenger, John

  1. Archibald, G.C., and R.G. Lipsey: ‘“Monetary and Value Theory: A critique of Lange and Patinkin”, Review of Economic Studies (October 1958).  Google Scholar
  2. Clower, R.: “The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal”, in: The Theory of Interest Rates edited by F.H. Hahn and F. Brechling (London: Macmillan, 1965).  Google Scholar
  3. Mayer, T., The Structure of Monetarism, (New York: W. W. Norton, 1978).  Google Scholar