Year: 1981
Author: Tietzel, Manfred
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 101 (1981), Iss. 3 : pp. 237–265
Abstract
The 'assumptions controversy' which mainly took place between Friedman, Machlup and Samuelson did not lead to a satisfactory answer to the question whether 'assumptions' in economic theory should or should not be 'abstract'. If 'abstract', as Friedman suggested, means 'false' then falsity of (i) the antecedent clauses entails inapplicability of any theoretical argument. Falsity of (ii) the law statements in the explanans implies that the aim of theoretical progress is abandoned in favour of applicability of economic theory to only a given set of problems (instrumentalism). While 'abstractness' in the sense of 'incompleteness' of any explanation is unavoidable, semantic (use of theoretical terms) and syntactic 'abstractness' (use of strictly universal statements) turned out to be highly desirable characteristics of theories. Finally, axiomatic structuring of a theory, a last kind of 'abstractness', is a heuristic device for the improvement of the testability and applicability of economic theory.
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: Multiple languages
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.101.3.237
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 101 (1981), Iss. 3 : pp. 237–265
Published online: 1981-03
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 29
Author Details
-
Was kann man von der „Theorie rationaler Erwartungen“ rationalerweise erwarten
Manfred, Tietzel,
Credit and Capital Markets - Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 15 (1982), Iss. 4 P.492
https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.15.4.492 [Citations: 1] -
Finanzmarktsimulation mit Multiagentensystemen
Entscheidungstheoretische Grundlagen
2008
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5513-1_2 [Citations: 0]