Year: 2023
Author: Vincze, Attila
Der Staat, Vol. 62 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 71–89
Abstract
Right to an Effective Remedy or a Criterion of the Rule of Law? The shifting meaning of Art. 19 TEU in the case law of the ECJ
The Lisbon Treaty created a duty for the Member States to provide an effective remedy. This mandate has been transformed to a yardstick of the judicial independence during the last few years and, in doing so, to a tool for tackling the crisis of the Rule of Law in Europe. This mainly substantive perspective is however very narrow, neglects the procedural obstacles and is therefore a lopsided one. The present article pinpoints the formal and informal hurdles of enforcing those newly found standards of judicial independence, and highlights that the right to an access to the courts – as part of the effective judicial protection – is a precondition of any assessment for any assessment of the judicial independence.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: German
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/staa.62.1.71
Der Staat, Vol. 62 (2023), Iss. 1 : pp. 71–89
Published online: 2023-01
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 19
Author Details
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Berichte und Kritik | 71 | ||
| Rechtsschutzauftrag oder Rechtsstaatlichkeitskriterium? | 71 | ||
| Zum Bedeutungswandel des Art. 19 EUV in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH | 71 | ||
| I. Problemaufriss | 71 | ||
| II. Die Objektivierung von Art. 19 EUV als Rechtsstaatlichkeitskriterium | 72 | ||
| III. Prozessrechtliche Filter der Rechtsstaatlichkeitsprüfung | 76 | ||
| 1. Vertragsverletzungsverfahren | 76 | ||
| 2. Vorabentscheidungsverfahren | 78 | ||
| IV. Asymmetrische Informationslage | 82 | ||
| V. Die Reduktion der Wirksamkeit auf eine Justizförmigkeit | 85 | ||
| 1. Justizförmigkeit vs. Wirksamkeit: die unterschiedlichen Rechtsfolgen | 86 | ||
| 2. Der faire Zugang zum Gericht als Kriterium der Wirksamkeit | 87 | ||
| VI. Fazit | 89 |