Year: 2022
Author: Eisfeld, Jens
Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch, Vol. 32 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 127–169
Abstract
This paper deals with the justification of law in Neo-Kantianism. The analysis focuses both on the widespread misconceptions to which research in the philosophy of law is subject when dealing with this doctrine and on the effects these misconceptions have on the interpretation of the writings of Emil Lask and Gustav Radbruch. The misunderstanding that Neo-Kantianism was hostile to metaphysics has a particularly detrimental effect here: Not only does it obscure the idealistic and religionist character of the Neo-Kantian justification of law, but it also supports the incorrect view that the justification of law in the facts of social reality, typical of legal positivism, is unmetaphysical or free of a priori assumptions.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: German
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/jpd.32.1.127
Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch, Vol. 32 (2022), Iss. 1 : pp. 127–169
Published online: 2022-01
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 43
Author Details
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jens Eisfeld, Zur Rechtsbegründung im Neukantianismus | 127 | ||
| Abstract | 127 | ||
| I. Das Rechtsgrundproblem | 127 | ||
| II. Kritik einiger Fehlvorstellungen über den Neukantianismus | 130 | ||
| III. Das erfahrungskonstitutive Vernunftwesen als Grund einer Theorie des positiven Rechts | 138 | ||
| IV. Zur Rechtsbegründung bei Emil Lask und Gustav Radbruch | 153 | ||
| V. Zum Spätwerk von Lask und Radbruch („Natur der Sache“, „Bedeutungsdifferenzierung“, „Radbruchsche Formel“) | 162 | ||
| VI. Fazit | 165 |