Regimewandel oder -beständigkeit in Krisenzeiten? Die politische Regulierung des Gesundheitszugangs Geflüchteter in Deutschland während der Migrations[management]krise
Year: 2023
Author: Roos, Mechthild
Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 72 (2023), Iss. 7-8 : pp. 635–652
Abstract
Regime Change or Regime Persistence in Times of Crisis? – The Political Regulation of Forced Migrants’ Healthcare Access in Germany in the Context of the ‘Migration [Administration] Crisis’
This article sheds light on the political regulation of forced migrants’ healthcare access in Germany in the context of the so-called ‘migration [administration] crisis’ (2015–16). It explains reforms in the area by situating them within a regime-theoretical framework and contemporary political context. In its analysis, this article focuses on an issue which is key to forced migrants’ societal as well as economic incorporation in a host country, and which constitutes thus a model case study for the regulation of forced migrants’ rights and opportunities in Germany more broadly. Within the scope of this special issue, the area of political measures examined here – measures which are expressly tailored to a societal target group of particularly vulnerable persons – functions as a lens in the broader investigation of sociopolitical developments during the ‘Merkel era’, and notably in times of crisis. Namely, the analysis of these persons’ changing position(ing) within the welfare state allows for important insight into larger dynamics of change, given that persons at the margins of society are typically among the first who get to feel political consequences when a system comes under strain.
You do not have full access to this article.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution
Journal Article Details
Publisher Name: Global Science Press
Language: German
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.72.7-8.635
Sozialer Fortschritt, Vol. 72 (2023), Iss. 7-8 : pp. 635–652
Published online: 2023-07
AMS Subject Headings: Duncker & Humblot
Copyright: COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press
Pages: 18
Author Details
-
Baldi, G./Wallace Goodman, S. (2015): Migrants into Members: Social Rights, Civic Requirements, and Citizenship in Western Europe, West European Politics, 38(6): S. 1152–1173.
Google Scholar -
Bardelle, A./Steinfurth, E. (2021): Psychische Erkrankungen und krankheitsbedingte Abschiebungsverbote. September 2021. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den Darlegungspflichten in der Entscheidungspraxis des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge, Berlin.
Google Scholar -
Beauclercq, I./Viello, F./Petrova-Benedict, R./Val, E. (2019): Overview of Migration and Health in Europe, in Krämer, A./Fischer, F. (eds.), Refugee Migration and Health. Challenges for Germany and Europe, Cham, S. 19–37.Boräng, F. (2018): National Institutions – International Migration. Labour Markets, Welfare States and Immigration Policy, London/New York.
Google Scholar -
Butenop, J./Pruskil, S./Grünberger, E. (2019): Future Challenges for the Public and Curative Health Sector, in Krämer, A./Fischer, F. (eds.), Refugee Migration and Health. Challenges for Germany and Europe, Cham, S. 119–132.
Google Scholar -
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990): The three worlds of welfare capitalism, Princeton.
Google Scholar -
Eurostat (2023): Asylum applicants by type of applicant, citizenship, age and sex – annual aggregated data, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/migr_asyappctza/default/table?lang=en [27.01.2023].
Google Scholar -
Giudici, D. (2020): The list. On discretion and refusal in the Italian asylum system, European Journal of Social Work, 23(3): S. 437–448.
Google Scholar -
Herrler, K./ Hollederer, A. (2019): Die stationäre Versorgung von Migranten und Flüchtlingen in Deutschland, in Pundt, J./Cacace, M. (eds.), Diversität und gesundheitliche Chancengleichheit, Bremen, S. 205–230.
Google Scholar -
Hess, S./Nagel, A.-K. (2021): Paternalism and Control: Germany’s Exceptionalism Revisited, in Barthoma, S./Çetrez, Ö. A. (eds.), RESPONDing to Migration. A Holistic Perspective on Migration Governance, Uppsala, S. 163–186.
Google Scholar -
Kaya, A./Nagel, A.-K. (2021): Reception Policies, Practices and Responses, Barthoma, S./Çetrez, Ö. A. (eds.), RESPONDing to Migration. A Holistic Perspective on Migration Governance, Uppsala, S. 227–256.
Google Scholar -
Kohlbacher, J./Six-Hohenbalken, M. (2020): Vorwort, in Kohlbacher, J./Six-Hohenbalken, M. (eds.), Vulnerabilität in Fluchtkontexten, ISR-Forschungsbericht Heft 53, Wien, S. 7–15.
Google Scholar -
Kuhn-Zuber, G. (2018): Sozialleistungsansprüche für Flüchtlinge und Unionsbürger. Beratungsleitfaden, Nomos.
Google Scholar -
Lehnert, M./Pelzer, M. (2010): Diskriminierendes Sondergesetz: Warum das Asylbewerberleistungsgesetz verfassungswidrig ist, Kritische Justiz, 43(4), 450–457.
Google Scholar -
Marmor, T. R./Okma, K. G. H./Latham, S. R. (2006): Values, Institutions and Health Politics. Comparative Perspectives, in Wendt, C./Wolf, C. (eds.), Soziologie der Gesundheit. Sonderheft 46/2006, Wiesbaden, S. 383–405.
Google Scholar -
Menke, K./Rumpel, A. (2022): Who Belongs, and How Far? Refugees and Bureaucrats Within the German Active Welfare State, Social Inclusion, 10(1), S. 217–226.
Google Scholar -
Roos, M. (2021): The impact of national values on health-care provisions for asylum seekers and refugees in Germany and Sweden, DPCE Online, 45(4), S. 5208–5225.
Google Scholar -
Roos, M. (2022): Inequality by design: The politics behind forced migrants’ access to healthcare, Medical Law Review, 30(4), S. 658–679.
Google Scholar -
Roosma, F./van Oorschot, W./Gelissen, J. (2016): The Achilles’ heel of welfare state legitimacy: perceptions of overuse and underuse of social benefits in Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2), S. 177–196.
Google Scholar -
Rothgang, H. (2006): Die Regulierung von Gesundheitssystemen in vergleichender Perspektive: Auf dem Weg zur Konvergenz?, in Wendt, C./Wolf, C. (eds.), Soziologie der Gesundheit. Sonderheft 46/2006, Wiesbaden, S. 289–319.
Google Scholar -
Sainsbury, D. (2012): Welfare States and Immigrant Rights. The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion, Oxford.
Google Scholar -
Schmalz, D. (2017): Verantwortungsteilung im Flüchtlingsschutz: Zu den Probleme ‘globaler Lösungen’, Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung (Z’Flucht), 1(1), S. 9–40.
Google Scholar -
Scholz, J. (2016): Gesundheit. Rahmenbedingungen der Gesundheitsversorgung von Flüchtlingen in Deutschland, in P. Bendel, P./Scholz, J./Borkowski, A./Hahn-Hobeck, N./Younso, C./Riemer, D. (eds.), Was Flüchtlinge brauchen – Ein Win-Win-Projekt, Erlangen, S. 183–202.
Google Scholar -
Suerhoff, A./Engelmann, C. (2021): Abschiebung trotz Krankheit. Perspektiven aus der Praxis und menschenrechtliche Verpflichtungen, Berlin.
Google Scholar -
Tiedemann, P. (2019): Flüchtlingsrecht. Die materiellen und verfahrensrechtlichen Grundlagen, Berlin.
Google Scholar -
Wenner, J./Namer, Y./Razum, O. (2019): Migrants, Refugees, Asylum Seekers: Use and Misuse of Labels in Public Health Research, in Krämer, A./Fischer, F. (eds.), Refugee Migration and Health. Challenges for Germany and Europe, Cham, S. 49–62.
Google Scholar -
Wiedl, K. H./Marschalck, P. (2001): Migration, Krankheit und Gesundheit: Probleme der Forschung, Probleme der Versorgung – eine Einführung, Migration und Krankheit, 10, S. 9–34.
Google Scholar
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Mechthild Roos: Regimewandel oder -beständigkeit in Krisenzeiten? Die politische Regulierung des Gesundheitszugangs Geflüchteter in Deutschland während der Migrations[management]krise | 635 | ||
Zusammenfassung | 635 | ||
Abstract: Regime Change or Regime Persistence in Times of Crisis? – The Political Regulation of Forced Migrants’ Healthcare Access in Germany in the Context of the ‘Migration [Administration] Crisis’ | 635 | ||
1. Einleitung | 636 | ||
2. Konzeptioneller Rahmen: An der Schnittstelle von drei Regimen | 637 | ||
3. Methodologische Vorgehensweise | 640 | ||
4. Historischer Kontext und rechtlich-politische Grundlagen | 641 | ||
5. Analyse der Regulierung des Gesundheitszugangs Geflüchteter im Kontext der Migrations[management]krise | 643 | ||
5.1 Maßnahmen, die den Gesundheitszugang Geflüchteter beschränken | 643 | ||
5.2 Maßnahmen, die den Gesundheitszugang Geflüchteter erweitern | 646 | ||
5.3 Welfare paternalism als erweiternde Regime-Dimension | 648 | ||
6. Fazit: Die Erklärkraft etablierter Regimeansätze für Politik im Krisenmodus | 649 | ||
Literatur- und Quellenverzeichnis | 651 |