THIS IS THE DEV/TESTING WEBSITE IPv4: 3.134.86.4 IPv6: || Country by IP: GB
Journals
Resources
About Us
Open Access

Vom Widerspruch zum informalen Beschwerdemanagement. Siegt der “Verhandlungsstaat“ über den “hoheitlichen Anordnungsstaat“?

Vom Widerspruch zum informalen Beschwerdemanagement. Siegt der “Verhandlungsstaat“ über den “hoheitlichen Anordnungsstaat“?

Year:    2010

Author:    Cancik, Pascale

Die Verwaltung, Vol. 43 (2010), Iss. 4 : pp. 467–499

Abstract

In the context of modernising the administration, and despite of severe scholarly criticism, many German States have abolished on a large scale the redress procedure (“Widerspruchs-” or “Vorverfahren”). The abolition is justified by the alleged failure – partial or total – of the redress procedure. Abolition, thus, seems to be a necessary reform and a characteristic of a modern administration. Preliminary empirical evaluations now enable us to assess carefully the consequences of the abolition. At the same time, the results allow us to draw conclusions regarding the effects and functions of the redress procedure. Administrative practise has revealed compensatory mechanisms that have developed to replace the (abolished) redress procedure in order to achieve the same effects through alternative methods of communication with the citizens. The supporters of the abolition enthusiastically hail these replacement mechanisms as a contribution towards a citizen-friendly management. To examine this assessment, this article summarises the practical effects of the procedural reduction. A typical feature of the observed administrative practises is their informality. Informalisation is to be reviewed sceptically because of its potential to discriminate as well as for its tendency to re-formalise.

You do not have full access to this article.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in as an individual or via your institution

Journal Article Details

Publisher Name:    Global Science Press

Language:    German

DOI:    https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.43.4.467

Die Verwaltung, Vol. 43 (2010), Iss. 4 : pp. 467–499

Published online:    2010-10

AMS Subject Headings:    Duncker & Humblot

Copyright:    COPYRIGHT: © Global Science Press

Pages:    33

Author Details

Cancik, Pascale

  1. Zwischen Staatsanstalt und Wettbewerb. Die Schulreform und ihr Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung des Verwaltungsrechts

    Wißmann,, Hinnerk

    Die Verwaltung, Vol. 45 (2012), Iss. 3 P.307

    https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.45.3.307 [Citations: 2]
  2. Verwaltungsrecht und Postdemokratie. Zur demokratischen Responsivität der Verwaltung

    Schaefer, Jan Philipp

    Die Verwaltung, Vol. 49 (2016), Iss. 4 P.463

    https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.49.4.463 [Citations: 0]
  3. Alternative Dispute Resolution in European Administrative Law

    Administrative Appeals in Germany

    Stelkens, Ulrich

    2014

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34946-1_1 [Citations: 1]