Anthropologische und ethnologische Grundlagen traditioneller und moderner Rechtssysteme / Monistic or Pluralistic Legal Culture? Anthropological and Ethnological Foundations of Traditional and Modern Legal Systems. Vorwort von / Preface by Ota Weinberger
Year: 2022
Editors: Sack, Peter, Wellman, Carl P., Yasaki, Mitsukuni
Series: Rechtstheorie. Beihefte, Vol. 12
Copyright Year: 1991
Book Details
ISBN: 978-3-428-47193-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-47193-5
Published online: 2022-03
Edition: 1
Language: German
Pages: 460
Keywords: Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie Recht Rechtsanthropologie Rechtsphilosophie
Subjects: Legal history ,
Pricing
Institution: €119.90 (incl. local VAT if applicable)
Individual: €119.90 (incl. local VAT if applicable)
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Editorisches Vorwort | V | ||
Editorial Preface | VII | ||
Vorwort | IX | ||
Inhaltsverzeichnis | XIII | ||
I. Brauch, Sitte und Recht auf dem Wege zum Rechtssystem | 1 | ||
Munyonzwe Hamalengwa, Toronto: THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ZAMBIA | 3 | ||
I. Historical Background | 3 | ||
II. Independent Zambia: Constitutional Basis | 6 | ||
1. Judiciary | 8 | ||
2. Individual Rights | 8 | ||
III. Civil Law | 8 | ||
1. Law of Succession | 9 | ||
a) Matrilineal Succession | 10 | ||
b) Patrilineal Succession | 10 | ||
2. Land Tenure System | 11 | ||
IV. Commercial Law | 11 | ||
1. Foreign Investment | 11 | ||
2. Business Organization | 13 | ||
3. Immigration Law | 14 | ||
4. Labour Law | 14 | ||
V. Courts and Civil Procedure | 16 | ||
1. Court Structure | 16 | ||
2. Civil Procedure | 19 | ||
3. Case Law | 19 | ||
4. Reporting Court Decisions | 20 | ||
5. Judicial Independence | 20 | ||
VI. Criminal Law and Procedure | 22 | ||
1. Substantive Crimes | 22 | ||
2. Investigation and Arrest | 23 | ||
3. Bail | 24 | ||
4. Evidence and Trial | 25 | ||
5. Sentencing | 25 | ||
6. Rights of Accused | 25 | ||
VII. Human Rights | 26 | ||
VIII. Legal Education and Profession | 28 | ||
IX. Recent Developments | 30 | ||
Sang-Bum Han/Kee-Young Yeun, Seoul: DEKOLONIALISIERUNG UND RECHTSKULTUR DER NEU GEGRÜNDETEN STAATEN | 33 | ||
I. Einleitung | 33 | ||
II. Die Hinterlassenschaft der Feudaldynastie und der Prozeß der (Teil)-Kolonialisierung | 33 | ||
1. Der Prozeß der (Teil)-Kolonialisierung, der Versuch der selbständigen Modernisierung und dessen Vereitelung | 33 | ||
2. Der Standort der feudalen Dynastie während der (Teil)-Kolonialzeit | 34 | ||
3. Die politische und legale Hinterlassenschaft der Feudaldynastie | 35 | ||
a) Die Nachteile des bürokratischen Systems | 35 | ||
b) Der Konfuzianismus und das patriarchalische Großfamiliensystem als Ideologie der feudalen Herrschaft | 35 | ||
c) Das Verbleiben des feudalen Standesbewußtseins im Produktions- und Arbeitsverhältnis | 36 | ||
d) Die Hinterlassenschaft des feudalen Kriminalsystems | 36 | ||
III. Zustand der (Teil)-Kolonie und die Berührung mit einem modernen Rechtssystem in dieser Zeit | 37 | ||
1. Der imperialistische Charakter (als Anstoß von außen) der westlichen Rechtskultur | 37 | ||
2. Probleme der Rezeption des westlichen Rechtssystems während der Zeit der (Teil)-Kolonie | 37 | ||
3. Die Bevölkerung der (Teil)-Kolonie als Leidende des modernen Rechtssystems und seine Hinterlassenschaft | 38 | ||
IV. Ende der Kolonialherrschaft und Aufgabe und Probleme der Rechtskultur | 39 | ||
1. Tilgung der Spuren des kolonialen Rechtssystems | 39 | ||
2. Probleme und Aufgabe der Dekolonialisierung | 40 | ||
M. A. Nezami Talesh, Riyadh: LAW AND JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN SAUDI ARABIA: THE FORMATIVE YEARS | 43 | ||
I. The Background | 43 | ||
II. Law and Legislation | 46 | ||
1. The Sharia | 47 | ||
2. The Non-Sharia Law | 49 | ||
III. The Judicial System | 56 | ||
1. The Sharia Courts | 57 | ||
2. The Non-Sharia Judicial Bodies | 61 | ||
3. The Judicial Procedure | 67 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 69 | ||
References | 70 | ||
Motoyoshi Omori, Tokyo: COLLECTIVE OBSERVANCE AND COMMUNITY SOLIDARITY. Restraint with Reiterative Folk Rituals in a Sri Lankan and a Japanese Village | 73 | ||
I. Norms, Sanction and Change | 73 | ||
II. Shinto and Buddhism in Ninoshima | 75 | ||
III. Buddhism and Hinduism at Beralapanatara | 77 | ||
IV. Discussion | 78 | ||
References | 81 | ||
Kun Yang, Seoul: LAW AND DEVELOPMENT WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CONTEMPORARY KOREA | 83 | ||
I. | 83 | ||
II. | 84 | ||
III. | 88 | ||
II. Traditionalismus und Modernismus im chinesischen Rechtsdenken | 91 | ||
Shing-I Liu, Taipei: RECHT UND GERECHTIGKEIT. Rechtsphilosophie in der traditionellen chinesischen Geisteswelt | 93 | ||
I. | 93 | ||
II. | 93 | ||
III. | 102 | ||
IV. | 111 | ||
V. | 121 | ||
Teh-Koan Liu, Tokyo: TRADITIONAL CHINESE LEGAL THOUGHT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RULE OF LAW IN TAIWAN, R.O.C. | 125 | ||
I. Forward | 125 | ||
II. Confucianism was the Most Important Influence in Traditional Legal Thought | 126 | ||
III. Virtue was the Core of Confucianism, Penalty was Secondary | 127 | ||
IV. Confucianism Valued Rule of Person Rather than the Rule of Law | 128 | ||
V. The Renaissance of Legalism in China | 130 | ||
VI. The Constitutionalization of the Republic of China and the Move to Taiwan | 131 | ||
Zongling Shen, Beijing: SOCIALIST MODERNIZATION AND LAW IN CHINA | 135 | ||
I. Economic Development, Economic Structure Reform and Law | 135 | ||
II. Development of Spiritual Civilization and Law | 138 | ||
III. Development of Democracy, Political Structure Reform and Law | 141 | ||
IV. Obstacles to Implementation of the Law | 142 | ||
Alice Erh-Soon Tay, Sidney: LAW IN THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA – THE FIFTH MODERNIZATION? | 145 | ||
Ji Weidong, Beijing: THE TRANSMUTATION AND INNER CONTRADICTION OF LEGAL CULTURE IN CHINA | 155 | ||
I. Introduction | 155 | ||
II. Traditional Legal Culture of China | 157 | ||
1. Isomeric Social Order and its Intermediate Mechanism | 157 | ||
2. Cultural Features of Compound Legal System | 158 | ||
a) Objectification of Subject | 159 | ||
b) Hypocrites, Lenience and Litigation-Weariness | 160 | ||
c) Legal Instrumentalism for the Purpose of Taming the People | 160 | ||
d) Lowly Status and Mentality of Legal Profession | 161 | ||
3. Major Categories of Legal Thinking and Sensations | 162 | ||
a) “To Know Shame, To be Sagacious” (Confucius) | 162 | ||
b) Persuasion | 162 | ||
c) Introspection | 163 | ||
d) Blend | 164 | ||
III. Ways and Means of Modernization and its Relationship to the Legal System | 164 | ||
1. Mobilization of Resources and Restriction of Rights | 165 | ||
2. Social Structure and Requirement of Law | 166 | ||
3. What Does Delegalization in the West Mean? | 167 | ||
4. Reform of Socialist Economic System and Legalization of Society | 168 | ||
IV. Conflicts and Crisscrosses in the Rapid Transmutation of Legal Culture | 169 | ||
1. The Mixed Structure of Legal Ideology | 171 | ||
2. The Awakening to Rights and Dissociation of Subject-Object | 172 | ||
3. Between Principles and Expedience | 173 | ||
V. Conclusion | 174 | ||
III. Rezeption von Recht in modernen Rechtssystemen | 177 | ||
Makoto Arai, Tokyo: DIE GRUNDLAGE FÜR DIE ÜBERNAHME DES DEUTSCHEN RECHTSGESCHÄFTSBEGRIFFS | 179 | ||
I. Problemstellung | 179 | ||
II. Entstehungsgeschichte des japanischen Zivilgesetzbuches | 180 | ||
1. Erste Stufe (1870–1878) | 181 | ||
2. Zweite Stufe (1879–1892) | 183 | ||
3. Letzte Stufe (1893–1898) | 190 | ||
4. Motiv der Übernahme | 193 | ||
III. Grundlage für die Übernahme | 196 | ||
John Robert Cassidy, Mahwah: AN UNDERGRADUATE COURSE IN COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDIES | 201 | ||
I. Comparative Functions of Law | 202 | ||
II. Language of the Law | 203 | ||
III. Practical Questions in the Administration of Law | 204 | ||
IV. Law and the Normative Order | 204 | ||
H. Patrick Glenn, Montreal: RECEPTION AND RECONCILIATION OF LAWS | 209 | ||
I. Reception and the Concept of a Legal System | 210 | ||
II. Functional and Non-Functional Reception | 211 | ||
III. Reconciliation of Laws | 213 | ||
Stephen Hicks, Boston: A MODEL OF SOCIETY FOR THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LAW | 215 | ||
References | 221 | ||
Urpo Kangas, Helsinki: ON STUDYING THE RECEPTION OF LEGAL IDEAS AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE LEGAL WORLD VIEW | 223 | ||
I. The Levels of the Legal World View | 223 | ||
II. On Studying the Influence of Ideas on the Legal World View | 227 | ||
Mohammad Koesnoe, Surabaya: THE PRACTICE OF THE DUTCH CIVIL CODE IN INDONESIA TODAY | 235 | ||
I. | 235 | ||
II. | 236 | ||
III. | 239 | ||
IV. | 240 | ||
V. | 241 | ||
VI. | 242 | ||
VII. | 246 | ||
Bin Takada, Osaka: DIE REZEPTION DES BEGRIFFS „RECHTSSTAAT“ IN JAPAN | 249 | ||
I. Vorbemerkung | 249 | ||
1. Aufgabenstellung dieser Abhandlung | 249 | ||
2. Die Ausgestaltung der Vorstellung vom Rechtsstaat in Deutschland | 250 | ||
II. Zur Ausbildung des Wortes „hochikoku“ | 252 | ||
III. Der Rechtsstaatsbegriff in der Wissenschaft | 254 | ||
IV. Die Vorstellung vom „Rechtsstaat“ innerhalb und außerhalb der Wissenschaft | 257 | ||
1. Die Trennung der Vorstellungen vom Rechtsstaat in- und außerhalb der Wissenschaft | 257 | ||
2. Ursache und Gestalt der getrennten Vorstellungen vom Rechtsstaat | 258 | ||
3. Veränderungen in den verschiedenen Zeitabschnitten – Die Trennung von wissenschaftlicher Auffassung und Volksmeinung | 259 | ||
V. Überblick | 261 | ||
1. Veränderungen nach dem 2. Weltkrieg in der Wissenschaft | 261 | ||
2. Volksmeinung | 263 | ||
IV. Kulturelle Konflikte in und zwischen Rechtssystemen | 265 | ||
Upendra Baxi, New Delhi: THE CONFLICTING CONCEPTIONS OF LEGAL CULTURES AND THE CONFLICT OF LEGAL CULTURES | 267 | ||
I. Towards a Jurisprudence of Contradictory Worlds | 267 | ||
II. Genesis Amnesia and the Discovery of Legal Pluralism | 269 | ||
III. The Conflicting Conceptions of Legal Culture | 273 | ||
IV. The Juridical World Outlook: Juristische Weltanschauung | 280 | ||
V. Towards a Conclusion | 282 | ||
Masaji Chiba, Tokyo: LEGAL PLURALISM IN AND ACROSS LEGAL CULTURES | 283 | ||
I. How to Dispose of Nuclear Waste: Japan vs. Pacific Nations | 283 | ||
II. Conflict between Legal Cultures: Japanese vs. Oceanian | 287 | ||
III. Role of Legal Culture in Legal Pluralism | 295 | ||
References | 304 | ||
Helena Gourko, Minsk: SCIENCE AND MORALS IN NON-WESTERN CULTURED TRADITION | 307 | ||
Tetsunori Koizumi, Columbus: CULTURAL DIFFUSION, ECONOMIC INTEGRATION AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE NATION-STATE | 313 | ||
I. Social Change in an Interdependent World | 313 | ||
II. Cultural Diffusion | 313 | ||
III. Economic Integration | 314 | ||
IV. Culture, Economy and Polity | 315 | ||
V. Resolving the Conflict among Culture, Economy and Polity | 317 | ||
VI. The Nation-State in the New World of Global Interdependence | 318 | ||
VII. A New Consciousness | 319 | ||
Kálmán Kulcsár, Budapest: POLITICAL CULTURE – LEGAL CULTURE CONFLICTS AND HARMONY. A Study on East-Central Europe | 321 | ||
I. | 322 | ||
II. | 325 | ||
III. | 339 | ||
References | 340 | ||
Masaru Miyamoto, Osaka: ‘JUDGES’ IN THE PHILIPPINE HIGHLANDS: A STUDY OF HANUNOO-MANGYAN LEGAL CULTURE | 343 | ||
I. Introduction | 343 | ||
II. Methods of Conflict Management and the Socio-Cultural Roles of ‘Judges’ | 343 | ||
III. Socio-Political Changes and the Judges | 346 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 348 | ||
References | 348 | ||
Peter G. Sack, Canberra: LAW, MORALS AND RELIGION A MELANESIAN PERSPECTIVE | 351 | ||
I. | 351 | ||
II. | 352 | ||
III. | 356 | ||
III. | 369 | ||
References | 371 | ||
V. Recht, Umwelt und Weltordnung | 373 | ||
Jan M. van Dunné, Rotterdam: THE RHINE POLLUTION BY INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES: NEW DIMENSIONS OF THE GOOD NEIGHBOUR DOCTRINE? | 375 | ||
I. Introduction. The Change from the International to the National Law Approach in Environmental Liability | 375 | ||
II. Liability for Rhine Pollution in the Courts: the French Potassium Mines Case | 376 | ||
III. The Sic Utere Principle in International Law and Private Law Compared. The Good Neighbour Doctrine Revisited | 378 | ||
IV. Environmental Liability in Japanese Law | 381 | ||
Robert Ginsberg, Media: PEACE AS A HUMAN RIGHT | 383 | ||
Lawrence Haworth, Waterloo: PSYCHOLOGICAL FREEDOM | 389 | ||
I. Psychological Freedom as Self Control | 390 | ||
II. Freedom as Self-Expression | 392 | ||
William E. Murnion, Mahwah: IDEOLOGY AND HUMAN RIGHTS | 397 | ||
Rajendra Kumar Nayak, New Delhi: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND LAW: QUEST FOR FUTURE WORLD ORDER | 403 | ||
I. Developing Countries | 404 | ||
II. India | 405 | ||
III. Pragmatic Approach | 406 | ||
IV. Bhopal and Chernobyl Disasters | 407 | ||
V. Desertification | 408 | ||
VI. Deforestation | 409 | ||
VII. Observations | 415 | ||
Juhani Pietarinen, Turku: RATIONALITY AND MENTAL INCONSISTENCIES | 417 | ||
I. Epistemic Inconsistencies | 417 | ||
1. Epistemic Opposition and Incongruence | 418 | ||
2. Epistemic Discordance | 418 | ||
3. Relations between Knowledge and Belief | 419 | ||
II. Axiotic Inconsistencies | 421 | ||
1. Axiotic Opposition | 422 | ||
2. Axiotic Discordance | 423 | ||
3. Axiological Incongruence | 423 | ||
III. Combining Epistemic and Axiotic Attitudes | 425 | ||
Jerzy Wróblewski, Łódź: NATURE AND MAN: DILEMMA OF THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE | 427 | ||
I. Introductory Observations | 427 | ||
II. The Man and Nature Relations | 428 | ||
III. Man and Nature Dilemmas | 431 | ||
IV. Concluding Remarks | 436 | ||
References | 437 | ||
Mitarbeiterverzeichnis (einschl. des Beirats der Herausgeber) | 439 | ||
Beiträge des 13. Weltkongresses für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Kobe /Japan Gesamtverzeichnis | 442 | ||
1. Verlag Duncker & Humblot: Beihefte zu RECHTSTHEORIE, 1991 | 442 | ||
2. Verlag Franz Steiner Wiesbaden GmbH: Beihefte zum ARCHIV FÜR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 1991 | 443 |